Privacy Center
Corporate private notice
Effective Date: May 25, 2018
Last updated: April 7, 2024
Scope:
This Privacy Notice (“Notice”) describes how Clarivate (“Clarivate”, “we”, “us” and “our”) collect, use, share, secure, and eventually dispose of (collectively “process”) personal data. Personal data is any information that does, or could, identify you.
This Notice applies to personal data collected by our websites, apps, and products (collectively “services”), and in the course of routine offline business contact with you where we are the data controller. Additional information on our personal data practices may be provided in offer descriptions, supplemental privacy notices or notices provided prior to or at the time of data collection. Certain Clarivate websites may have their own privacy notice that describes how we handle personal data for those websites specifically. To the extent a notice provided at the time of collection or a website or service specific privacy notice conflict with this Notice, such specific notice or supplemental privacy statement will control.
Click on the links below to learn more about how we treat your personal data.
Click here for our supplemental privacy notice for California residents under the CCPA/CPRA.
Click here for our supplemental privacy notice for residents of Virginia, Colorado, Utah and Connecticut.
Click here for our supplemental privacy notice for individuals in China under the PIPL.
Click here for our supplemental privacy notice for individuals in Brazil under the LGPD.
SCIENTIFIC & ACADEMIC RESEARCH | RESEARCH PUBLISHING SOLUTIONS
ScholarOne
Comprehensive workflow management for scholarly journals
Simplify journal management with a flexible, trusted solution:As the world of scholarly publishing continually evolves, you need a reliable solution that can adapt with your changing needs.
With ScholarOne Manuscripts, you can easily align your journal management with your strategy—whether you need to establish more efficient workflows, attract and retain a broader pool of reviewers and authors, or adopt increasingly open models. Maintain and build your prestige in the publishing landscape with a solution that protects your data and reputation.
Tackle your biggest challenges:- Reduce friction for your editors and staff.
Unmatched configurability, high-touch implementation and support, and complete access to your data mean you can design and maintain a system that perfectly meets your needs, even as they change. - Attract and retain reviewers and authors.
Engage researchers with a first-rate user experience, including an intuitive interface that 80% of surveyed authors and reviewers find easy to use. - Preserve research integrity.
Detect anomalous behavior and reduce integrity-related retractions by uncovering issues before publication.
“European Research Studies Journal”
ISSN: 1108-2976p / 3057-4331e
ICV 2022: 88.33
The result of the assessment in the ICI Journals Master List database – the Index Copernicus Value (ICV) – is a measure of the parametric power of a scientific journal. It indicates to what extent the journal meets international standards in the field of key functional areas of this medium of science.
The ICV consists of two main components: quality of the journal and journal’s impact.
Description
| Subject Area | Business, Management and Accounting Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous) |
| Category | Economics, Econometrics and Finance Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous) |
| Publisher | International Strategic Management Association, EU |
| ISSN | 1108-2976p / 3057-4331e |
Identifying Fake Journals
6 April 2023
Statement from COPE Officers
COPE believes that authors and institutions should treat lists of predatory (or fake) journals with the same degree of scrutiny as they do with the journals themselves. Lists that are not transparent about criteria used should not be relied on. Moreover, such lists may perpetuate systemic bias and include journals with limited resources, but which are legitimate journals with the best intentions.
COPE supports the use of Think.Check.Submit. A simple checklist authors can use before submitting research to a journal. Think.Check.Submit. asks the author questions aligned with the Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing, a set of criteria used by COPE, DOAJ, OASPA and WAME when assessing journals which apply for membership of their organizations. Many predatory journals and publishers do not fulfil these criteria.
COPE’s Predatory Publishing discussion document expands on how authors, reviewers, editors, and institutions can identify predatory journals.
Related resources:
Think.Check.Submit.
Predatory Publishing, COPE discussion document
Avoiding predatory publishers, guest article
Indexes
